Jennifer Rubin: Palin in Ascendance, Liberals Admit Defeat

Jennifer Rubin writes in Commentary:She certainly has them on the run. At the National Mall rally on Saturday, Sarah Palin delivered an eloquent and moving tribute to servicemen and a nonpartisan call to restore ? not transform ? America. The complete text should be read in full. (If you are not moved to tears by the stories of three heroic military men, you have a heart of stone.)....Meanwhile, Palin clearly has the left in a tizzy. They have finally gotten it: she is redefining feminism. In the New York Times, two liberal feminists exhibit more than a little anxiety over the Palin juggernaut. To put it bluntly, they have Palin envy:In the 24 months since her appearance onstage in Dayton, Ohio, Ms. Palin has enthralled pundits and journalists who devote countless television hours and column inches to her every Twitter message and Facebook update, while provoking outrage and exasperation from the left. ?The left should be outraged and exasperated by all this ? but at their own failings as much as Ms. Palin?s ascension. Since the 2008 election, progressive leaders have done little to address the obvious national appetite for female leadership. And despite (or because of) their continuing obsession with Ms. Palin, they have done nothing to stop an anti-choice, pro-abstinence, socialist-bashing Tea Party enthusiast from becoming the 21st century symbol of American women in politics.You betcha. You see, Palin has proved by example that a woman politician need not spout the pro-big government, pro-abortion, pro-welfare-state line. ?Ms. Palin has spent much of 2010 burnishing her political bona fides and extending her influence by way of the Mama Grizzlies, a gang of Sarah- approved, maverick-y female politicians looking to ?take back? America with ?common-sense? solutions.? She sure did, and she proved herself to be the most effective female politician in the country. Sorry, Hillary ? while you have been playing errand girl for the Obama foreign-policy train wreck, Palin has ascended to the throne. (Nancy Pelosi?s days are numbered.) The left is waving the white flag of surrender:It?s easy of course, for liberals to laugh off Ms. Palin?s ?you go, girl!? ethos and increasingly aggressive co-optation of feminist symbols. We progressives discount her references to the women?s movement ? not to mention her validity as a candidate ? by looking down on her as a dim, opportunistic, mean-girl prom queen, all spunk and no policy muscle. ?If Sarah Palin and her acolytes successfully redefine what it means to be a groundbreaking political woman, it will be because progressives let it happen ? and in doing so, ensured that when it comes to making history, there will be no one but Mama Grizzlies to do the job.Wow. And it?s really worse than the New York Times worriers admit. Palin not only trumped the left on style but she also managed to connect on nearly every issue ? ObamaCare, bailouts, Israel, taxes, American exceptionalism, and the stimulus plan ? in a way the president and his liberal supporters could not. For all of her supposed lack of ?policy muscle,? it was she who defined the debate on ObamaCare and she who synced up with the Tea Party?s small-government, personal-responsibility, anti-tax-hike message. Who?s short on policy muscle ? the White House or Palin? Does ?engagement? of despots, Israel-bashing, and capitulation to Russia make for a meaty foreign-policy agenda? Go read a Palin foreign-policy address or two. Plenty of meat and common sense there.But I give the Times gals credit ? they know they are losing the battle to discredit Palin. Now they need to figure out what to do about it. They might start with examining whether their agenda has as much sell as hers.

Jan Brewer Bill Brady Karl Rove Palin